Michael Contento
Mutation Testing and Fuzzing in C#
#1about 3 minutes
Understanding the limitations of code coverage metrics
Different code coverage strategies like function, statement, and branch coverage can be misleading and turn testing into a numbers game.
#2about 4 minutes
Introducing mutation testing with a practical example
Mutation testing flips the testing paradigm by intentionally introducing small bugs (mutants) into your code to see if your existing tests can catch them.
#3about 3 minutes
Automating mutation testing in C# with Stryker
The Stryker framework for .NET automates the process of creating mutants, running tests against them, and generating an HTML report to identify weak spots in your test suite.
#4about 5 minutes
Exploring the different types of code mutations
Stryker can generate a wide variety of mutants by altering arithmetic operators, comparison logic, LINQ expressions, and even regular expressions to thoroughly challenge your tests.
#5about 4 minutes
Introducing the core concepts of fuzzing for quality
Fuzzing aims to find program crashes by feeding it mutated, semi-random input that is more effective than purely random data for discovering edge cases.
#6about 2 minutes
How coverage-guided fuzzing intelligently finds bugs
Coverage-guided fuzzing uses instrumentation to track which code paths are executed, prioritizing mutated inputs that explore new areas of the application.
#7about 3 minutes
Using AFL and SharpFuzz for fuzzing in C#
Combine the powerful AFL (American Fuzzy Lop) engine with the SharpFuzz library to create a test harness for fuzzing C# code, including whitelisting expected exceptions.
#8about 5 minutes
Analyzing fuzzing results and practical considerations
Learn to interpret the output from a fuzzing session to identify crash-causing inputs and consider the performance impact when integrating these tools into a CI/CD pipeline.
Related jobs
Jobs that call for the skills explored in this talk.
Matching moments
03:15 MIN
Using mutation testing and metrics to improve quality
Testing .NET applications a Tool box for every developer
02:48 MIN
Using mutation testing to measure test suite quality
Test-reduction - Doing more with less
02:53 MIN
Exploring the future of automated security analysis
Reviewing 3rd party library security easily using OpenSSF Scorecard
02:50 MIN
Why traditional testing methods fail to guarantee quality
How will artificial intelligence change the future of software testing?
03:31 MIN
Exploring dynamic analysis security testing (DAST)
Why Security-First Development Helps You Ship Better Software Faster
02:18 MIN
Comparing techniques for automated test case generation
How will artificial intelligence change the future of software testing?
05:54 MIN
Going beyond unit tests with modern application testing
What Developers Get Wrong About Application Quality
02:14 MIN
A maturity model for unit testing beyond code coverage
Are you still programming unit tests or already generating?
Featured Partners
Related Videos
Testing .NET applications a Tool box for every developer
Alexandre Borges
Test-reduction - Doing more with less
Ewald Verhoeven
Continuous testing - run automated tests for every change!
Christian Kühn
Using code generation for test automation ā the fancy way
Roman Alexis Anastasini
Your Testing Strategy is broken - lets fix it!
Luise Freese
How not to test
Golo Roden
How To Test A Ball of Mud
Ryan Latta
Using non-functional testing to guide user interface, backend services, voice interface, and media development
Brien Colwell
Related Articles
View all articles

.webp?w=240&auto=compress,format)

From learning to earning
Jobs that call for the skills explored in this talk.


Saby New Compy
Karlsruhe, Germany
Intermediate

Think-cell
Foster City, United States of America
Intermediate
Unit Testing
Manual Testing
Automated Testing





HvS-Consulting GmbH
Garching b. München, Germany
Intermediate
Senior
.NET
Angular
TypeScript

doinstruct Software GmbH
Berlin, Germany
Senior
GIT
JavaScript
TypeScript